Case analysis: lucy v. zehmer

 

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

  • Identify the contractual element Zehmer contended was missing.
  • Summarize the court ruling and explain the reason for the ruling.
  • Agree or disagree with the ruling, and include a rationale to support your ideas.
  • Summarize a personal experience in which you entered into a contract that you did not think of as a binding contract at the time. Consider which elements of a contract were in place and which were missing.